0966Sy
Code what?
I'd like to bring up a few thoughts about launching our trucks at the track to determine a combination that results in the best 60ft's and ET's at the track. As there are so many determining factor's i'd like to gather info regarding Footbrake vs Transbrake, 2-step's and Torque converter stall speed efficiancy. Selecting the right TC. I dont want to discuss suspension, tires just a discussion of the above. There are alot of guy's going fast on a FB (footbrake) spooling the turbo against a high stall speed converter. Anyone going fast on a TB (transbrake) with a lower stall speed?
I think our turbocharged V6's with a low rpm redline are overestimated on stall speed when selecting stall speed of a torque converter. Seems to be that everyone thinks the bigger the turbo the faster the ET. So when choosing a big turbo, automatically one is to assume they need a high stall speed to spool there large turbo.
Most of us judge our stall speed based on brake stall when boost launching. When our actual stall speed would be higher at flash stall, when at WOT against the brake. Both situations cause wheel spin limiting your stall flash. So accuratly testing stall would be against a TB, not allowing the TC to hold back engine peak torque.
When selecting a stall speed you want to select based on your engines peak torque RPM, no more. If anything 500rpm less.
So wouldnt we want to select our stall speed based on our engines ability to make max torque and launch at that RPM to gain the best 60ft and ET? So many fast trucks come off the line spinning becuase they are launching at such a high RPM? Lowering launch RPM closer to stall speed would result in better traction and using the engines ability to ceate torque throughout more of the rpm range of the engine.
What data do we have from a stock SyTy Dyno with factory TC/turbo?
I think our turbocharged V6's with a low rpm redline are overestimated on stall speed when selecting stall speed of a torque converter. Seems to be that everyone thinks the bigger the turbo the faster the ET. So when choosing a big turbo, automatically one is to assume they need a high stall speed to spool there large turbo.
Most of us judge our stall speed based on brake stall when boost launching. When our actual stall speed would be higher at flash stall, when at WOT against the brake. Both situations cause wheel spin limiting your stall flash. So accuratly testing stall would be against a TB, not allowing the TC to hold back engine peak torque.
When selecting a stall speed you want to select based on your engines peak torque RPM, no more. If anything 500rpm less.
So wouldnt we want to select our stall speed based on our engines ability to make max torque and launch at that RPM to gain the best 60ft and ET? So many fast trucks come off the line spinning becuase they are launching at such a high RPM? Lowering launch RPM closer to stall speed would result in better traction and using the engines ability to ceate torque throughout more of the rpm range of the engine.
What data do we have from a stock SyTy Dyno with factory TC/turbo?
Last edited: