THEMADTYPH00N
Active member
I've seached for a thread to answer this question but haven't been able to find one. Anyway for a stock truck is it better to stick with the AC CR42TS's or go to the NGK UR5's? Thanks
UR5's vs. CR42TS's
- Thread starter THEMADTYPH00N
- Start date
Depends on the person you talk to and what the phase the moon is in.
I have not heard anything bad about running the UR5s on a stock truck. Everyone I have talked to or read about has had great luck with them. I will be trying them on my Ty here very soon - just waiting to run the Top Engine Cleaner first.
I have not heard anything bad about running the UR5s on a stock truck. Everyone I have talked to or read about has had great luck with them. I will be trying them on my Ty here very soon - just waiting to run the Top Engine Cleaner first.
InvisiBill
Active member
A lot of people (myself included) say the UR5 gives a smoother idle. I didn't notice a huge difference, but it did seem to run a little smoother. NGKs seem to be a bit easier to get around here too for some reason...
manitoufs
Member
I am running UR6XI's. Got about 5,000 miles on 'em. I really can't tell the diff. They were in when I ran a Datamaster recorded 13.66 @ 100 mph with my stock Ty. (101 octane and a cool morning.) I replaced a good set of AC's when I put them in. I guess I'll see how long they last.
Coloty
New member
I ran the stock CR42TS strictly up until a month ago when I deceided to give the UR5s a try. They did smooth out the idle a little and other wise perform like the CR42TS (which is good) Stable under boost.....blah.....blah.......blah and they are easier to find around the Denver area. I would say give em a try to anyone that has not.